Selective lifelong suppression of an odor processing channel in response to critical period experience

  1. Hans C Leier
  2. Julius Jonaitis
  3. Alexander J Foden
  4. Abigail J Wilkov
  5. Paola Van der Linden Costello
  6. Heather T Broihier  Is a corresponding author
  7. Andrew M Dacks  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, United States
5 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Lifelong suppression of Or42a OSNs after critical-period EB exposure.

(A) Schematic of the Drosophila olfactory circuit at the level of the AL. OSN, olfactory sensory neuron, PN, projection neuron, LN, local interneuron, EG, ensheathing glia. (B) Overview of odorant-exposure experiments. Flies are exposed to 15% (v/v) ethyl butyrate (EB) or mineral oil vehicle control during the Or42a OSN critical period from 0 to 2 days post-eclosion (DPE). (C–F) Live imaging of Or42a OSN odor-evoked activity at 2 (C, D) or 25 (E, F) DPE, following exposure to 15% EB or mineral oil from 0 to 2 DPE. Or42a-GAL4>UAS-GCaMP8f flies were stimulated with three 1 s puffs (yellow bars) of 5% EB (red traces and data points) or mineral oil vehicle control (gray traces and data points) spaced 10 s apart. Traces (C, E) show the mean ΔF/F0 values of all trials. Data points (D, F) represent the mean peak ΔF/F0 values for each fly. (G–H) Live imaging of ASAP5 responses in Or42a OSNs in 2 DPE flies following exposure to 15% EB or mineral oil from 0 to 2 DPE. Flies were stimulated with odor puffs as above. Traces (G) represent the mean ΔF/F0 values of all trials. Data points (H) represent the mean peak ΔF/F0 values for each animal. Data in (D, F), and (H) are mean± SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, unpaired t-test (D) or Mann–Whitney U-test (F, H). Genotypes, raw values, and detailed statistics are provided in Figure 1—source data 1.

Experience-dependent pruning in VM7 is restricted to the presynaptic compartment.

(A–B) Live imaging of VM7 projection neuron (PN) odor-evoked activity at 2 days post-eclosion (DPE), following exposure to 15% ethyl butyrate (EB) or mineral oil from 0 to 2 DPE. VM7 PN split-GAL4 >UAS-GCaMP8f flies were stimulated with three 1 s puffs (yellow bars) of 5% EB (red traces and data points) or mineral oil vehicle control (gray traces and data points) spaced 10 s apart. Traces (A) show the mean ΔF/F0 values of all trials. Data points (B) represent the mean peak ΔF/F0 values for each fly. (C) Representative dendritic arbors of VM7 PNs endogenously expressing the V5-tagged postsynaptic marker Discs large 1 (Dlg1), from flies exposed to mineral oil or 15% EB from 0 to 2 DPE. (D) Normalized counts of Dlg1 puncta. (E) Representative images of VM7 PNs after exposure to mineral oil or 15% EB from 0 to 2 DPE. Neuropil is visualized with antibody staining for the presynaptic active zone protein Bruchpilot (Brp). PN dendritic arbors occupying VM7 are enclosed in white boxes. (F) Volumetric measurements of VM7 PN dendritic arbors shown in (E). (G) Representative images of VM7 PN axonal arbors after exposure to mineral oil or 15% EB from 0 to 2 DPE. (H) Volumetric measurements of VM7 PN axonal arbors shown in (G). (I) Models of VM7 PN presynapses from (G) after exposure to mineral oil or 15% EB from 0 to 2 DPE, defined as Brp puncta masked by mCD8::GFP-labeled VM7 PNs. (J) Normalized counts of VM7 PN presynapses from (I). Data are mean± SD. ns, p≥0.05, *p<0.05, Mann–Whitney U-test. Genotypes, raw values, and detailed statistics are provided in Figure 2—source data 1.

Experience-dependent pruning and inhibition are decoupled in Or43b olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs).

(A) DoOR 2.0 profile of ethyl butyrate (EB) responses across all Drosophila odorant receptors (ORs). (B–C) Representative images (bottom) and quantification of presynaptic content (B) and volume (C) of VM2 (Or43b OSNs) and VM7 (Or42a OSNs) in flies exposed to mineral oil or 15% EB from 0 to 2 days post-eclosion (DPE). Presynapses were visualized with Bruchpilot (Brp) staining. Data are mean± SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, unpaired t-test. (D–E) Two-photon imaging of GCaMP8f responses in Or43b OSNs at 2 DPE following exposure to 15% EB or mineral oil from 0 to 2 DPE. Awake flies were stimulated with three 1 s odor puffs (yellow bars) of 5% EB (red traces and data points) or mineral oil (gray traces and data points), spaced 10 s apart. Traces (D) represent the mean ΔF/F0 values of all trials. Data points (E) represent the mean peak ΔF/F0 values for each animal. Genotypes, raw values, and detailed statistics are provided in Figure 3—source data 1.

Differential patterns of local interneuron (LN) innervation may contribute to interglomerular differences in experience-dependent glial pruning.

(A) Numbers of neurons within the cell types included in (B) and (C). (B–C) Sankey diagrams of the synaptic inputs and outputs of Or42a (B) and Or43b (C) olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). Inputs were thresholded at 99% of all synapses and outputs were thresholded at 95% of all synapses. Brackets contain the number of synapses and percentage of total synapses for that category. All connectomic analyses are derived from the FlyWire FAFB dataset. Synapse counts are provided in Figure 4—source data 1.

GABAergic inputs restrain glial pruning.

(A–B) Representative images (bottom) and quantification of VM7 (A) and VM2 (B) volume in flies exposed to mineral oil or 15% ethyl butyrate (EB) from 0 to 2 days post-eclosion (DPE). Data are mean ± SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001, one-way ANOVA. Genotypes, raw values, and detailed statistics are provided in Figure 5—source data 1.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-GCaMP8fBDSCBDSC Stock #92587; RRID:BDSC_92587; FlyBase ID: FBst0092587Genotype: w[1118]; PBac{y[+mDint2] w[+mC]=20XUAS-IVS-jGCaMP8f}VK00005
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-ASAP5BDSCBDSC Stock #605337; RRID:BDSC_605337; FlyBase ID: FBst0605337Genotype: w[*]; S (1)/CyO; PBac{y[+mDint2] w[+mC]=20XUAS-ASAP5}VK00005/TM6B, Tb(1)
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or42a-mCD8::GFPGolovin et al., 2019Broadie labGenotype: w; Or42a-mCD8::GFP
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or43b-GAL4BDSCBDSC Stock #23894; RRID:BDSC_23894; FlyBase ID: FBst0023894Genotype: w[*]; P{w[+mC]=Or43b-GAL4.C}110t8.1
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or42a-GAL4BDSCBDSC Stock #9970; RRID:BDSC_9970; FlyBase ID: FBst0009970Genotype: w[*]; P{w[+mC]=Or42 a-GAL4.F}48.3B
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)dlg1[4 K]Parisi et al., 2023Mosca labGenotype: dlg1[4 K], UAS-Flp[8208]
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-mCD8::GFPBDSCBDSC Stock #32186; RRID:BDSC_32186; FlyBase ID: FBst0032186Genotype: w*; P{10XUAS-IVS-mCD8::GFP}attP40
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)VM7 PN split-GAL4Xie et al., 2021Janelia FlyLight Split-GAL4 Driver Collection, line SS01265Genotype: w; VT033006-p65ADZp in attP40; R19G08-ZpGdbd in attP2/TM6B
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-LexA RNAiBDSCBDSC Stock # 67947; RRID:BDSC_67947; FlyBase ID: FBst0067947Genotype: y(1) sc[*] v(1) sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS05772}attP40
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-rdl RNAiBDSCBDSC Stock # 31286; BDSC_31286; FlyBase ID: FBst0031286Genotype: y(1) v(1); P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01227}attP2
AntibodyGoat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor Plus 647Thermo Fisher ScientificCat #A32728;
RRID:AB_2866490
Used 1:400 (IHC)
Antibodyanti-Bruchpilot (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #nc82;
RRID:AB_2314866
Used 1:50 (IHC)
Antibodyanti-GFP, Alexa Fluor 488 (Rabbit polyclonal)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat #A21311; RRID:AB_221477Used 1:200 (IHC)
Antibodyanti-V5 tag, Alexa Fluor 488 (Mouse monoclonal)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat #37–7500 A488; RRID:AB_2610630Used 1:100
(IHC)
Software, algorithmImarisBitplaneRRID:SCR_007370
Software, algorithmFlyWirehttps://flywire.ai/RRID:SCR_019205
Software, algorithmfafbseghttps://github.com/navis-org/fafbseg-py; Schlegel, 2026; Dorkenwald et al., 2024; Schlegel et al., 2024RRID:SCR_008394Python package
Software, algorithmDoOR.datahttps://github.com/ropensci/DoOR.data; Münch, 2026aRRID:SCR_000432R package for DoOR data
Software, algorithmDoOR.functionshttps://github.com/ropensci/DoOR.functions; Münch, 2026bRRID:SCR_000432R package for DoOR functions

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hans C Leier
  2. Julius Jonaitis
  3. Alexander J Foden
  4. Abigail J Wilkov
  5. Paola Van der Linden Costello
  6. Heather T Broihier
  7. Andrew M Dacks
(2026)
Selective lifelong suppression of an odor processing channel in response to critical period experience
eLife 14:RP108236.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.108236.3